245- ] English Literature
Virginia Woolf
While
she is best known for her novels, especially Mrs. Dalloway (1925) and To the
Lighthouse (1927), Woolf also wrote pioneering essays on artistic theory,
literary history, women’s writing, and the politics of power. A fine stylist,
she experimented with several forms of biographical writing, composed painterly
short fictions, and sent to her friends and family a lifetime of brilliant
letters.
Early
life and influences
Born
Virginia Stephen, she was the child of ideal Victorian parents. Her father,
Leslie Stephen, was an eminent literary figure and the first editor (1882–91)
of the Dictionary of National Biography. Her mother, Julia Jackson, possessed
great beauty and a reputation for saintly self-sacrifice; she also had prominent
social and artistic connections, which included Julia Margaret Cameron, her
aunt and one of the greatest portrait photographers of the 19th century. Both
Julia Jackson’s first husband, Herbert Duckworth, and Leslie’s first wife, a
daughter of the novelist William Makepeace Thackeray, had died unexpectedly,
leaving her three children and him one. Julia Jackson Duckworth and Leslie
Stephen married in 1878, and four children followed: Vanessa (born 1879), Thoby
(born 1880), Virginia (born 1882), and Adrian (born 1883). While these four
children banded together against their older half siblings, loyalties shifted
among them. Virginia was jealous of Adrian for being their mother’s favourite.
At age nine, she was the genius behind a family newspaper, the Hyde Park Gate
News, that often teased Vanessa and Adrian. Vanessa mothered the others,
especially Virginia, but the dynamic between need (Virginia’s) and aloofness
(Vanessa’s) sometimes expressed itself as rivalry between Virginia’s art of
writing and Vanessa’s of painting.
The
Stephen family made summer migrations from their London town house near
Kensington Gardens to the rather disheveled Talland House on the rugged
Cornwall coast. That annual relocation structured Virginia’s childhood world in
terms of opposites: city and country, winter and summer, repression and
freedom, fragmentation and wholeness. Her neatly divided, predictable world
ended, however, when her mother died in 1895 at age 49. Virginia, at 13, ceased
writing amusing accounts of family news. Almost a year passed before she wrote
a cheerful letter to her brother Thoby. She was just emerging from depression
when, in 1897, her half sister Stella Duckworth died at age 28, an event
Virginia noted in her diary as “impossible to write of.” Then in 1904, after
her father died, Virginia had a nervous breakdown.
While
Virginia was recovering, Vanessa supervised the Stephen children’s move to the
bohemian Bloomsbury section of London. There the siblings lived independent of
their Duckworth half brothers, free to pursue studies, to paint or write, and
to entertain. Leonard Woolf dined with them in November 1904, just before
sailing to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) to become a colonial administrator. Soon the
Stephens hosted weekly gatherings of radical young people, including Clive
Bell, Lytton Strachey, and John Maynard Keynes, all later to achieve fame as,
respectively, an art critic, a biographer, and an economist. Then, after a
family excursion to Greece in 1906, Thoby died of typhoid fever. He was 26.
Virginia grieved but did not slip into depression. She overcame the loss of
Thoby and the “loss” of Vanessa, who became engaged to Bell just after Thoby’s
death, through writing. Vanessa’s marriage (and perhaps Thoby’s absence) helped
transform conversation at the avant-garde gatherings of what came to be known
as the Bloomsbury group into irreverent, sometimes bawdy repartee that inspired
Virginia to exercise her wit publicly, even while privately she was writing her
poignant “Reminiscences”—about her childhood and her lost mother—which was
published in 1908. Viewing Italian art that summer, she committed herself to
creating in language “some kind of whole made of shivering fragments,” to
capturing “the flight of the mind.”
Early
fiction
Virginia
Stephen determined in 1908 to “re-form” the novel by creating a holistic form
embracing aspects of life that were “fugitive” from the Victorian novel. While
writing anonymous reviews for the Times Literary Supplement and other journals,
she experimented with such a novel, which she called Melymbrosia. In November
1910, Roger Fry, a new friend of the Bells, launched the exhibit “Manet and the
Post-Impressionists,” which introduced radical European art to the London
bourgeoisie. Virginia was at once outraged over the attention that painting
garnered and intrigued by the possibility of borrowing from the likes of
artists Paul Cézanne and Pablo Picasso. As Clive Bell was unfaithful, Vanessa
began an affair with Fry, and Fry began a lifelong debate with Virginia about
the visual and verbal arts. In the summer of 1911, Leonard Woolf returned from
the East. After he resigned from the colonial service, Leonard and Virginia
married in August 1912. She continued to work on her first novel; he wrote the
anticolonialist novel The Village in the Jungle (1913) and The Wise Virgins
(1914), a Bloomsbury exposé. Then he became a political writer and an advocate
for peace and justice.
Between
1910 and 1915, Virginia’s mental health was precarious. Nevertheless, she
completely recast Melymbrosia as The Voyage Out in 1913. She based many of her
novel’s characters on real-life prototypes: Lytton Strachey, Leslie Stephen,
her half brother George Duckworth, Clive and Vanessa Bell, and herself. Rachel
Vinrace, the novel’s central character, is a sheltered young woman who, on an
excursion to South America, is introduced to freedom and sexuality (though from
the novel’s inception she was to die before marrying). Woolf first made
Terence, Rachel’s suitor, rather Clive-like; as she revised, Terence became a
more sensitive, Leonard-like character. After an excursion up the Amazon,
Rachel contracts a terrible illness that plunges her into delirium and then
death. As possible causes for this disaster, Woolf’s characters suggest
everything from poorly washed vegetables to jungle disease to a malevolent
universe, but the book endorses no explanation. That indeterminacy, at odds
with the certainties of the Victorian era, is echoed in descriptions that
distort perception: while the narrative often describes people, buildings, and
natural objects as featureless forms, Rachel, in dreams and then delirium,
journeys into surrealistic worlds. Rachel’s voyage into the unknown began
Woolf’s voyage beyond the conventions of realism.
Woolf’s
manic-depressive worries (that she was a failure as a writer and a woman, that
she was despised by Vanessa and unloved by Leonard) provoked a suicide attempt
in September 1913. Publication of The Voyage Out was delayed until early 1915;
then, that April, she sank into a distressed state in which she was often
delirious. Later that year she overcame the “vile imaginations” that had
threatened her sanity. She kept the demons of mania and depression mostly at
bay for the rest of her life.
In
1917 the Woolfs bought a printing press and founded the Hogarth Press, named
for Hogarth House, their home in the London suburbs. The Woolfs themselves (she
was the compositor while he worked the press) published their own Two Stories
in the summer of 1917. It consisted of Leonard’s Three Jews and Virginia’s The
Mark on the Wall, the latter about contemplation itself.
Since
1910, Virginia had kept (sometimes with Vanessa) a country house in Sussex, and
in 1916 Vanessa settled into a Sussex farmhouse called Charleston. She had
ended her affair with Fry to take up with the painter Duncan Grant, who moved
to Charleston with Vanessa and her children, Julian and Quentin Bell; a
daughter, Angelica, would be born to Vanessa and Grant at the end of 1918.
Charleston soon became an extravagantly decorated, unorthodox retreat for
artists and writers, especially Clive Bell, who continued on friendly terms
with Vanessa, and Fry, Vanessa’s lifelong devotee.
Virginia
had kept a diary, off and on, since 1897. In 1919 she envisioned “the shadow of
some kind of form which a diary might attain to,” organized not by a mechanical
recording of events but by the interplay between the objective and the
subjective. Her diary, as she wrote in 1924, would reveal people as “splinters
& mosaics; not, as they used to hold, immaculate, monolithic, consistent
wholes.” Such terms later inspired critical distinctions, based on anatomy and
culture, between the feminine and the masculine, the feminine being a varied
but all-embracing way of experiencing the world and the masculine a monolithic
or linear way. Critics using these distinctions have credited Woolf with
evolving a distinctly feminine diary form, one that explores, with perception,
honesty, and humour, her own ever-changing, mosaic self.
Proving
that she could master the traditional form of the novel before breaking it, she
plotted her next novel in two romantic triangles, with its protagonist
Katharine in both. Night and Day (1919) answers Leonard’s The Wise Virgins, in
which he had his Leonard-like protagonist lose the Virginia-like beloved and
end up in a conventional marriage. In Night and Day, the Leonard-like Ralph
learns to value Katharine for herself, not as some superior being. And
Katharine overcomes (as Virginia had) class and familial prejudices to marry
the good and intelligent Ralph. This novel focuses on the very sort of details
that Woolf had deleted from The Voyage Out: credible dialogue, realistic
descriptions of early 20th-century settings, and investigations of issues such
as class, politics, and suffrage.
Woolf
was writing nearly a review a week for the Times Literary Supplement in 1918.
Her essay “Modern Novels” (1919; revised in 1925 as “Modern Fiction”) attacked
the “materialists” who wrote about superficial rather than spiritual or
“luminous” experiences. The Woolfs also printed by hand, with Vanessa Bell’s
illustrations, Virginia’s Kew Gardens (1919), a story organized, like a
Post-Impressionistic painting, by pattern. With the Hogarth Press’s emergence
as a major publishing house, the Woolfs gradually ceased being their own
printers.
In
1919 they bought a cottage in Rodmell village called Monk’s House, which looked
out over the Sussex Downs and the meadows where the River Ouse wound down to
the English Channel. Virginia could walk or bicycle to visit Vanessa, her children,
and a changing cast of guests at the bohemian Charleston and then retreat to
Monk’s House to write. She envisioned a new book that would apply the theories
of “Modern Novels” and the achievements of her short stories to the novel form.
In early 1920 a group of friends, evolved from the early Bloomsbury group,
began a “Memoir Club,” which met to read irreverent passages from their
autobiographies. Her second presentation was an exposé of Victorian hypocrisy,
especially that of George Duckworth, who masked inappropriate, unwanted
caresses as affection honouring their mother’s memory.
In
1921 Woolf’s minimally plotted short fictions were gathered in Monday or
Tuesday. Meanwhile, typesetting having heightened her sense of visual layout,
she began a new novel written in blocks to be surrounded by white spaces. In
“On Re-Reading Novels” (1922) Woolf argued that the novel was not so much a
form as an “emotion which you feel.” In Jacob’s Room (1922) she achieved such
emotion, transforming personal grief over the death of Thoby Stephen into a
“spiritual shape.” Though she takes Jacob from childhood to his early death in
war, she leaves out plot, conflict, even character. The emptiness of Jacob’s
room and the irrelevance of his belongings convey in their minimalism the
profound emptiness of loss. Though Jacob’s Room is an antiwar novel, Woolf
feared that she had ventured too far beyond representation. She vowed to “push
on,” as she wrote Clive Bell, to graft such experimental techniques onto
more-substantial characters.
Mrs.
Dalloway, To the Lighthouse, A Room of One’s Own and other major works of
Virginia Woolf
At
the beginning of 1924, the Woolfs moved their city residence from the suburbs
back to Bloomsbury, where they were less isolated from London society. Soon the
aristocratic Vita Sackville-West began to court Virginia, a relationship that
would blossom into a lesbian affair. Having already written a story about a
Mrs. Dalloway, Woolf thought of a foiling device that would pair that highly
sensitive woman with a shell-shocked war victim, a Mr. Smith, so that “the sane
and the insane” would exist “side by side.” Her aim was to “tunnel” into these
two characters until Clarissa Dalloway’s affirmations meet Septimus Smith’s
negations. Also in 1924 Woolf gave a talk at Cambridge called “Character in
Fiction,” revised later that year as the Hogarth Press pamphlet Mr. Bennett and
Mrs. Brown. In it she celebrated the breakdown in patriarchal values that had
occurred “in or about December, 1910”—during Fry’s exhibit “Manet and the
Post-Impressionists”—and she attacked “materialist” novelists for omitting the
essence of character.
In
Mrs. Dalloway (1925), the boorish doctors presume to understand personality,
but its essence evades them. This novel is as patterned as a Post-Impressionist
painting but is also so accurately representational that the reader can trace
Clarissa’s and Septimus’s movements through the streets of London on a single
day in June 1923. At the end of the day, Clarissa gives a grand party and Septimus
commits suicide. Their lives come together when the doctor who was treating
(or, rather, mistreating) Septimus arrives at Clarissa’s party with news of the
death. The main characters are connected by motifs and, finally, by Clarissa’s
intuiting why Septimus threw his life away.
Woolf
wished to build on her achievement in Mrs. Dalloway by merging the novelistic
and elegiac forms. As an elegy, To the Lighthouse—published on May 5, 1927, the
32nd anniversary of Julia Stephen’s death—evoked childhood summers at Talland
House. As a novel, it broke narrative continuity into a tripartite structure.
The first section, “The Window,” begins as Mrs. Ramsay and James, her youngest
son—like Julia and Adrian Stephen—sit in the French window of the Ramsays’
summer home while a houseguest named Lily Briscoe paints them and James begs to
go to a nearby lighthouse. Mr. Ramsay, like Leslie Stephen, sees poetry as
didacticism, conversation as winning points, and life as a tally of
accomplishments. He uses logic to deflate hopes for a trip to the lighthouse,
but he needs sympathy from his wife. She is more attuned to emotions than
reason. In the climactic dinner-party scene, she inspires such harmony and
composure that the moment “partook, she felt,…of eternity.” The novel’s middle
“Time Passes” section focuses on the empty house during a 10-year hiatus and
the last-minute housecleaning for the returning Ramsays. Woolf describes the
progress of weeds, mold, dust, and gusts of wind, but she merely announces such
major events as the deaths of Mrs. Ramsay and a son and daughter. In the
novel’s third section, “The Lighthouse,” Woolf brings Mr. Ramsay, his youngest
children (James and Cam), Lily Briscoe, and others from “The Window” back to
the house. As Mr. Ramsay and the now-teenage children reach the lighthouse and
achieve a moment of reconciliation, Lily completes her painting. To the
Lighthouse melds into its structure questions about creativity and the nature
and function of art. Lily argues effectively for nonrepresentational but
emotive art, and her painting (in which mother and child are reduced to two
shapes with a line between them) echoes the abstract structure of Woolf’s
profoundly elegiac novel.
In
two 1927 essays, “The Art of Fiction” and “The New Biography,” she wrote that
fiction writers should be less concerned with naive notions of reality and more
with language and design. However restricted by fact, she argued, biographers
should yoke truth with imagination, “granite-like solidity” with “rainbow-like
intangibility.” Their relationship having cooled by 1927, Woolf sought to
reclaim Sackville-West through a “biography” that would include Sackville
family history. Woolf solved biographical, historical, and personal dilemmas
with the story of Orlando, who lives from Elizabethan times through the entire
18th century; he then becomes female, experiences debilitating gender
constraints, and lives into the 20th century. Orlando begins writing poetry
during the Renaissance, using history and mythology as models, and over the ensuing
centuries returns to the poem “The Oak Tree,” revising it according to shifting
poetic conventions. Woolf herself writes in mock-heroic imitation of
biographical styles that change over the same period of time. Thus, Orlando: A
Biography (1928) exposes the artificiality of both gender and genre
prescriptions. However fantastic, Orlando also argues for a novelistic approach
to biography.
In
1921 John Maynard Keynes had told Woolf that her memoir “on George,” presented
to the Memoir Club that year or a year earlier, represented her best writing.
Afterward she was increasingly angered by masculine condescension to female
talent. In A Room of One’s Own (1929), Woolf blamed women’s absence from
history not on their lack of brains and talent but on their poverty. For her
1931 talk “Professions for Women,” Woolf studied the history of women’s
education and employment and argued that unequal opportunities for women
negatively affect all of society. She urged women to destroy the “angel in the
house,” a reference to Coventry Patmore’s poem of that title, the
quintessential Victorian paean to women who sacrifice themselves to men.
Having
praised a 1930 exhibit of Vanessa Bell’s paintings for their wordlessness,
Woolf planned a mystical novel that would be similarly impersonal and abstract.
In The Waves (1931), poetic interludes describe the sea and sky from dawn to
dusk. Between the interludes, the voices of six named characters appear in
sections that move from their childhood to old age. In the middle section, when
the six friends meet at a farewell dinner for another friend leaving for India,
the single flower at the centre of the dinner table becomes a “seven-sided
flower…a whole flower to which every eye brings its own contribution.” The
Waves offers a six-sided shape that illustrates how each individual experiences
events—including their friend’s death—uniquely. Bernard, the writer in the
group, narrates the final section, defying death and a world “without a self.”
Unique though they are (and their prototypes can be identified in the
Bloomsbury group), the characters become one, just as the sea and sky become
indistinguishable in the interludes. This oneness with all creation was the
primal experience Woolf had felt as a child in Cornwall. In this her most experimental
novel, she achieved its poetic equivalent. Through To the Lighthouse and The
Waves, Woolf became, with James Joyce and William Faulkner, one of the three
major English-language Modernist experimenters in stream-of-consciousness
writing.
Late
work
From
her earliest days, Woolf had framed experience in terms of oppositions, even
while she longed for a holistic state beyond binary divisions. The “perpetual
marriage of granite and rainbow” Woolf described in her essay “The New
Biography” typified her approach during the 1930s to individual works and to a
balance between writing works of fact and of imagination. Even before finishing
The Waves, she began compiling a scrapbook of clippings illustrating the
horrors of war, the threat of fascism, and the oppression of women. The
discrimination against women that Woolf had discussed in A Room of One’s Own
and “Professions for Women” inspired her to plan a book that would trace the
story of a fictional family named Pargiter and explain the social conditions affecting
family members over a period of time. In The Pargiters: A Novel-Essay she would
alternate between sections of fiction and of fact. For the fictional historical
narrative, she relied upon experiences of friends and family from the Victorian
Age to the 1930s. For the essays, she researched that 50-year span of history.
The task, however, of moving between fiction and fact was daunting.
Woolf
took a holiday from The Pargiters to write a mock biography of Flush, the dog
of poet Elizabeth Barrett Browning. Lytton Strachey having recently died, Woolf
muted her spoof of his biographical method; nevertheless, Flush (1933) remains
both a biographical satire and a lighthearted exploration of perception, in
this case a dog’s. In 1935 Woolf completed Freshwater, an absurdist drama based
on the life of her great-aunt Julia Margaret Cameron. Featuring such other
eminences as the poet Alfred, Lord Tennyson, and the painter George Frederick
Watts, this riotous play satirizes high-minded Victorian notions of art.
Meanwhile,
Woolf feared she would never finish The Pargiters. Alternating between types of
prose was proving cumbersome, and the book was becoming too long. She solved
this dilemma by jettisoning the essay sections, keeping the family narrative,
and renaming her book The Years. She narrated 50 years of family history
through the decline of class and patriarchal systems, the rise of feminism, and
the threat of another war. Desperate to finish, Woolf lightened the book with
poetic echoes of gestures, objects, colours, and sounds and with wholesale
deletions, cutting epiphanies for Eleanor Pargiter and explicit references to
women’s bodies. The novel illustrates the damage done to women and society over
the years by sexual repression, ignorance, and discrimination. Though (or
perhaps because) Woolf’s trimming muted the book’s radicalism, The Years (1937)
became a best seller.
When
Fry died in 1934, Virginia was distressed; Vanessa was devastated. Then in July
1937 Vanessa’s elder son, Julian Bell, was killed in the Spanish Civil War
while driving an ambulance for the Republican army. Vanessa was so disconsolate
that Virginia put aside her writing for a time to try to comfort her sister.
Privately a lament over Julian’s death and publicly a diatribe against war,
Three Guineas (1938) proposes answers to the question of how to prevent war.
Woolf connected masculine symbols of authority with militarism and misogyny, an
argument buttressed by notes from her clippings about aggression, fascism, and
war.
Still
distressed by the deaths of Roger Fry and Julian Bell, she determined to test
her theories about experimental, novelistic biography in a life of Fry. As she
acknowledged in “The Art of Biography” (1939), the recalcitrance of evidence
brought her near despair over the possibility of writing an imaginative
biography. Against the “grind” of finishing the Fry biography, Woolf wrote a
verse play about the history of English literature. Her next novel, Pointz Hall
(later retitled Between the Acts), would include the play as a pageant
performed by villagers and would convey the gentry’s varied reactions to it. As
another holiday from Fry’s biography, Woolf returned to her own childhood with
“A Sketch of the Past,” a memoir about her mixed feelings toward her parents
and her past and about memoir writing itself. (Here surfaced for the first time
in writing a memory of the teenage Gerald Duckworth, her other half brother,
touching her inappropriately when she was a girl of perhaps four or five.)
Through last-minute borrowing from the letters between Fry and Vanessa, Woolf
finished her biography. Though convinced that Roger Fry (1940) was more granite
than rainbow, Virginia congratulated herself on at least giving back to Vanessa
“her Roger.”
Woolf’s
chief anodyne against Adolf Hitler, World War II, and her own despair was
writing. During the bombing of London in 1940 and 1941, she worked on her
memoir and Between the Acts. In her novel, war threatens art and humanity
itself, and, in the interplay between the pageant—performed on a June day in
1939—and the audience, Woolf raises questions about perception and response.
Despite Between the Acts’s affirmation of the value of art, Woolf worried that
this novel was “too slight” and indeed that all writing was irrelevant when
England seemed on the verge of invasion and civilization about to slide over a
precipice. Facing such horrors, a depressed Woolf found herself unable to
write. The demons of self-doubt that she had kept at bay for so long returned
to haunt her. On March 28, 1941, fearing that she now lacked the resilience to
battle them, she walked behind Monk’s House and down to the River Ouse, put
stones in her pockets, and drowned herself. Between the Acts was published
posthumously later that year.
Legacy
of Virginia Woolf
Woolf’s
experiments with point of view confirm that, as Bernard thinks in The Waves,
“we are not single.” Being neither single nor fixed, perception in her novels
is fluid, as is the world she presents. While Joyce and Faulkner separate one
character’s interior monologues from another’s, Woolf’s narratives move between
inner and outer and between characters without clear demarcations. Furthermore,
she avoids the self-absorption of many of her contemporaries and implies a
brutal society without the explicit details some of her contemporaries felt
obligatory. Her nonlinear forms invite reading not for neat solutions but for
an aesthetic resolution of “shivering fragments,” as she wrote in 1908. While
Woolf’s fragmented style is distinctly Modernist, her indeterminacy anticipates
a postmodern awareness of the evanescence of boundaries and categories.
Woolf’s
many essays about the art of writing and about reading itself today retain
their appeal to a range of, in Samuel Johnson’s words, “common” (unspecialized)
readers. Woolf’s collection of essays The Common Reader (1925) was followed by
The Common Reader: Second Series (1932; also published as The Second Common
Reader). She continued writing essays on reading and writing, women and
history, and class and politics for the rest of her life. Many were collected
after her death in volumes edited by Leonard Woolf.
Virginia
Woolf wrote far more fiction than Joyce and far more nonfiction than either
Joyce or Faulkner. Six volumes of diaries (including her early journals), six
volumes of letters, and numerous volumes of collected essays show her deep
engagement with major 20th-century issues. Though many of her essays began as
reviews, written anonymously to deadlines for money, and many include
imaginative settings and whimsical speculations, they are serious inquiries
into reading and writing, the novel and the arts, perception and essence, war
and peace, class and politics, privilege and discrimination, and the need to
reform society.