28 - ] Model SAT Tests
Test Twenty Nine
Read each
passage below , and then answer the questions that follow the passage . The
correct response may be stated outright or merely suggested in the passage .
Questions
1 - 13 are based on the following passages .
The following passages
deal with the exotic world of subatomic physics . Passage 1 , written by a
popularizer of contemporary physics , was published in 1985 . Passage 2 was
written nearly 15 years later .
Passage 1
The classical idea of matter was
something with solidity and mass , like wet stone dust pressed in a fist. If
matter was composed of atoms , then the atoms too must have solidity and mass .
At the beginning of the twentieth century the atom was imagined as a tiny
billiard ball or a granite pebble writ . Then , in the physics of Niels Bohr ,
the miniature billiard ball because something akin to a musical instrument , a
finely tuned Stradivarius 10 billion times smaller than the real thing . With
the advent of quantum mechanics , the musical instrument gave a way to pure
music . On the atomic scale , the solidity and mass of matter dissolved into
something light and airy . Suddenly physicists were describing atoms in the
vocabulary of the composer - “resonance, ” “frequency” “scale.” Atomic
electrons sang in choirs like seraphim , cherubim , thrones , and dominions.
Classical distinctions between matter and light became muddles . In the new
physics , light bounced about like particles and matter undulated in waves like
light .
In recent decades , physicists have
uncovered elegant subatomic structures in the music of matter . They use a
strange new language to describe the subatomic world : quark , squark , gluon , gauge , Technicolor , flavor
, strangeness, charm . There are up quarks and down quarks top quarks
and bottom quarks . There are particles with truth and antitruth
, and there are particles with naked
beauty . The simplest of the constituents of ordinary matter - the proton ,
for instance - has taken on the character of a Bach fugue , a four-part
counterpoint of matter , energy , space , and time . At matter’s heart
there are arpeggios , chromatics , syncopation . On the lowest rung of the
chain of being . Creation dances .
Already , the astronomers and the
particle physicists are engaged in a vigorous dialogue . The astronomers are
prepared to recognize that the large-scale structure of the universe may have
been determined by subtle interactions of particles in the first moments of the
Big Bang . And the particle physicists are hoping to find confirmation of their
theories of subatomic structure in the astronomers’ observations of deep space
and time . The snake has bitten its tail and won’t let go .
Passage 2
Consider a dew drop , poised at the
tip of a grass blade . Only one millimeter in diameter , this tiny dew drop is
composed of a billion trillion molecules of water , each consisting of two
hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom (Ң 2 O ) . At the onset of the twentieth
century , this was the accepted view of the nature of matter . Atoms were seen
as matter’s basic building blocks , elementary or fundamental particles that
could not be divided into anything smaller .
This relatively simple picture ,
however , changed drastically as physicists came to explore the secrets of the
subatomic world . The once-indivisible atom , split , was revealed to consist
of a nucleus made up f protons and neutrons around which electrons orbited .
Protons and neutrons , in turn , were composed of even smaller subatomic
particles whimsically dubbed quarks . At first , theorists claimed that all
matter was made of three fundamental particles : electrons and paired up and
down quarks . Later , however , experiments with powerful accelerators and
colliding particle beams suggested the existence of other pairs of quarks ,
three generations in all , whose mass increased with each generation . Lightest
of all were the first generation quarks , up and down , which combined to
create the basic protons and neutrons ; somewhat heavier were the second
generation quarks , strange and charm , the building blocks of the more
esoteric particles produced in the physicists’ labs . Then in 1977 a team
headed by Fermilab physicist Leon Lederman uncovered the possibility of a third
generation of quarks . Using new accelerators with higher energies , they
produced a short-lived heavy particle , the upsilon , whose properties
suggested it could not be made of the four quarks then known . They concluded
it must be made of a fifth quark , which they named bottom , whereupon
scientists throughout the world set off in hot pursuit of bottom’s hypothetical
partner , top .
The hunt for the top quark consumed the
world’s particle physicists for nearly twenty years . It was their Grail , and
they were as determined as any knight of King Arthur’s court to succeed in
their holy quest . To Harvard theorist Sheldon Glashow in 1994 , it was “not
just another quark . It’s the last blessed one , and the sooner we find it ,
the better everyone will feel ,” Indeed , they had to find it , for the
Standard Model of particle physics , the theoretical synthesis that reduced the
once maddening hordes of particles ( the s0-called “particle zoo” ) to just a
few primary components , hinged upon existence . Physicists likened the
missing quark to the keystone of an arch : the Standard Model , like an arch ,
was supported by all its constituents , but it was the keystone , the last
piece to go in , that ensured the structure’s stability .
In 1995 the physicists found the
keystone to their arch , and with it , new questions to answer . surprisingly
the top quark was far heavier than theorists had predicated , nearly twice as
heavy in fact . Fermilab physicist Alvin Tollestrup originally had estimated
top to weight at least as much as a silver atom . At the hunt’s end , top was
determined to have a mass similar to that of an atom of gold . (With an atomic
weight of 197 , a gold atom is made up of hundreds of up and down quarks
. ) The question thus remains , why is top so massive ? Why does any
fundamental particle have mass ? With its astonishing heft , the top quark
should help clarify the hidden mechanisms that make some particles massive
while others have no mass at all .
1 . Which of the following
would be the most appropriate title for Passage 1 ?
(A) Linguistic Implications
of Particle Physics
(B) The Influence of Music on
Particle Interactions
(C) Matter’s Transformation :
The Music of Subatomic Physics
(D) Trends in Physics
Research : Eliminating the Quark
(E) The Impossible Dream :
Obstacles to Proving the Existence of Matter
2 . The author of Passage 1
refers to quarks , squarks , and charms ( paragraph 2 ) primarily in order to
(A) demonstrate the
similarity between these particles and earlier images of the atom
(B) make a distinction
between appropriate and inappropriate terms
(C) object to suggestions of
similar frivolous names
(D) provide examples of
idiosyncratic nomenclature in contemporary physics
(E) cite preliminary
experimental evidence supporting the existence of subatomic matter
3. The author’s tone in the
second paragraph of Passage 1 can best be described as one of
(A) scientific detachment
(B) moderate indignation
(C) marked derision
(D) admiring wonder
(E) qualified skepticism
4 .The underlined “Matter’s heart” mentioned in paragraph 2 is
(A) outer space
(B) the subatomic world
(C) the language of particle
physics
(D) harmonic theory
(E) flesh and blood
5 . At the end of Passage 1,
the image of the snake biting its tail is used to emphasize
(A) the dangers of circular
reasoning
(B) the vigor inherent in
modern scientific dialogue
(C) the eventual triumph of
the classical idea of matter
(D) the unity underlying the
astronomers’ and particle physicists’ theories
(E) the ability of
contemporary scientific doctrine to swallow earlier theories
6 . The underlined word “
properties” at the end of paragraph 2 , Passage 2 most nearly means
(A) lands (B) titles (C) investments
(D) civilities (E) characteristics
7 . Glashow’s comment in paragraph 3 , Passage
2 reflects his
(A) apprehension (B) impatience (C) imagination (D) jubilation (E)
spirituality
8 . The references to the
“keystone” of the arch at the end of paragraph 3 , Passage 2 serve to
(A) diminish the top quark’s
status to that of a commodity
(B) provide an accurate
physical description of the elusive particle
(C) highlight the contrast
between appearance and reality
(D) give an approximation of
the top quark’s actual mass
(E) illustrate the importance
of the top quark to subatomic theory
9 . The underlined word
“hinged” in paragraph 3 , Passage 2 most nearly means
(A) folded (B) vanished (C) remarked
(D) depended (E) weighed
10author of Passage 2 does
all of the following EXCEPT
(A) cite an authority
(B) use a simile
(C) define a term
(D) pose a question
(E) deny a possibility
11 . The author of Passage 2
mentions the gold atom at the end of paragraph 4 , Passage 2 primarily to
(A) clarify the monetary
value of the top quark
(B) explain what is meant by
atomic weight
(C) illustrate how hefty a
top quark is compared to other particles
(D) suggest the sorts of
elements studied in high-energy accelerators
(E) demonstrate the
malleability of gold as an element
12 . As Passage 2 suggests ,
since the time Passage 1 was written , the Standard Model has
(A) determined even more whimsical
names for the subatomic particles under discussion
(B) taken into account the
confusion of the particle physicists
(C) found theoretical
validation through recent experiments
(D) refuted significant
aspects of the Big Bang theory of the formation of the universe
(E) collapsed for lack of
proof of the existence of top quarks
13 . The author of Passage 2
would most likely react to the characterization of the constituents of matter
in Passage 1 “The simplest……Creation dances” by pointing out that
(A) this characterization has
been refuted by prominent physicists
(B) the characterization is
too fanciful to be worthwhile
(C) the most recent data on
subatomic particles support this characterization
(D) this characterization
supersedes the so-called Standard Model
(E) the current theoretical synthesis is founded on this characterization
No comments:
Post a Comment