187- ] English Literature
Emily Bronte
Emily's Gondal poems
Inspired
by a box of toy soldiers Branwell had received as a gift,[11] the children
began to write stories, which they set in a number of invented imaginary worlds
populated by their soldiers as well as their heroes, the Duke of Wellington and
his sons, Charles and Arthur Wellesley. Little of Emily's work from this period
survives, except for poems spoken by characters. Initially, all four children
shared in creating stories about a world called Angria.
However,
when Emily was 13, she and Anne withdrew from participation in the Angria story
and began a new one about Gondal, a fictional island whose myths and legends
were to preoccupy the two sisters throughout their lives. With the exception of
their Gondal poems and Anne's lists of Gondal's characters and placenames,
Emily and Anne's Gondal writings were largely not preserved. Among those that
did survive are some "diary papers", written by Emily in her
twenties, which describe current events in Gondal. The heroes of Gondal tended
to resemble the popular image of the Scottish Highlander, a sort of British
version of the "noble savage": romantic outlaws capable of more
nobility, passion, and bravery than the denizens of "civilization".
Similar themes of romanticism and noble savagery are apparent across the
Brontës' juvenilia, notably in Branwell's The Life of Alexander Percy, which
tells the story of an all-consuming, death-defying, and ultimately
self-destructive love and is generally considered an inspiration for Wuthering
Heights.
At
seventeen, Emily began to attend the Roe Head Girls' School, where Charlotte
was a teacher, but suffered from extreme homesickness and left after only a few
months. Charlotte wrote later that "Liberty was the breath of Emily's
nostrils; without it, she perished. The change from her own home to a school
and from her own very noiseless, very secluded but unrestricted and unartificial
mode of life, to one of disciplined routine (though under the kindest
auspices), was what she failed in enduring... I felt in my heart she would die
if she did not go home, and with this conviction obtained her recall."[17]
Emily returned home and Anne took her place.[18][a] At this time, the girls'
objective was to obtain sufficient education to open a small school of their
own.
Adulthood
Constantin
Héger, teacher of Charlotte and Emily during their stay in Brussels, on a
daguerreotype dated c. 1865
Emily
became a teacher at Law Hill School in Halifax beginning in September 1838,
when she was twenty. Her always fragile health soon broke under the stress of
the 17-hour workday, and she returned home in April 1839.[20] Thereafter she
remained at home, doing most of the cooking, ironing, and cleaning at Haworth.
She taught herself German out of books and also practised the piano.
In
1842, Emily accompanied Charlotte to the Héger Pensionnat in Brussels, Belgium,
where they attended the girls' academy run by Constantin Héger in the hope of
perfecting their French and German before opening their school. Unlike
Charlotte, Emily was uncomfortable in Brussels, and refused to adopt Belgian
fashions, saying "I wish to be as God made me", which rendered her
something of an outcast. Nine of Emily's French essays survive from this
period. Héger seems to have been impressed with the strength of Emily's
character, writing that:
She
should have been a man – a great navigator. Her powerful reason would have
deduced new spheres of discovery from the knowledge of the old; and her strong
imperious will would never have been daunted by opposition or difficulty, never
have given way but with life. She had a head for logic , and a capability of
argument unusual in a man and rarer indeed in a woman... impairing this gift
was her stubborn tenacity of will which rendered her obtuse to all reasoning
where her own wishes, or her own sense of right, was concerned.
The
two sisters were committed to their studies and by the end of the term had become
so competent in French that Madame Héger proposed that they both stay another
half-year , even, according to Charlotte, offering to dismiss the English
master so that she could take his place. Emily had, by this time, become a
competent pianist and teacher and it was suggested that she might stay on to
teach music. However, the illness and
death of their aunt drove them to return to their father and Haworth. In 1844,
the sisters attempted to open a school in their house, but their plans were
stymied by an inability to attract students to the remote area.
In
1844, Emily began going through all the poems she had written, recopying them
neatly into two notebooks. One was labelled "Gondal Poems"; the other
was unlabelled. Scholars such as Fannie Ratchford and Derek Roper have
attempted to piece together a Gondal storyline and chronology from these poems.
In the autumn of 1845, Charlotte discovered the notebooks and insisted that the
poems be published. Emily, furious at the invasion of her privacy, at first
refused but relented when Anne brought out her own manuscripts and revealed to
Charlotte that she had been writing poems in secret as well. As co-authors of
Gondal stories, Anne and Emily were accustomed to read their Gondal stories and
poems to each other, while Charlotte was excluded from their privacy. Around
this time Emily had written one of her most famous poems "No coward soul
is mine", probably as an answer to the violation of her privacy and her
own transformation into a published writer. Despite Charlotte's later claim, it
was not her last poem.
In
1846, the sisters' poems were published in one volume as Poems by Currer,
Ellis, and Acton Bell. The Brontë sisters had adopted pseudonyms for
publication, preserving their initials: Charlotte was "Currer Bell",
Emily was "Ellis Bell" and Anne was "Acton Bell". Charlotte
wrote in the 'Biographical Notice of Ellis and Acton Bell' that their
"ambiguous choice" was "dictated by a sort of conscientious
scruple at assuming Christian names positively masculine, while we did not like
to declare ourselves women, because... we had a vague impression that
authoresses are liable to be looked on with prejudice". Charlotte
contributed 19 poems, and Emily and Anne each contributed 21. Although the
sisters were told several months after publication that only two copies had
sold, they were not discouraged (of their two readers, one was impressed enough
to request their autographs). The Athenaeum reviewer praised Ellis Bell's work
for its music and power, singling out his poems as the best: "Ellis
possesses a fine, quaint spirit and an evident power of wing that may reach
heights not here attempted", and The Critic reviewer recognised "the
presence of more genius than it was supposed this utilitarian age had devoted
to the loftier exercises of the intellect."
Personality
and character
Emily
Brontë's solitary and reclusive nature has made her a mysterious figure and a
challenge for biographers to assess.[38][39] Except for Ellen Nussey and Louise
de Bassompierre, Emily's fellow student in Brussels, she does not seem to have
made any friends outside her family. Her closest friend was her sister Anne.
Together they shared their own fantasy world, Gondal, and, according to Ellen
Nussey, in childhood they were "like twins", "inseparable
companions" and "in the very closest sympathy which never had any
interruption". In 1845 Anne took Emily to visit some of the places she had
come to know and love in the five years she spent as governess. A plan to visit
Scarborough fell through and instead the sisters went to York where Anne showed
Emily York Minster. During the trip the sisters acted out some of their Gondal
characters.
Charlotte
Brontë remains the primary source of information about Emily, although as an
elder sister, writing publicly about her only shortly after her death, she is
considered by certain scholars not to be a neutral witness. Stevie Davies
believes that there is what might be called "Charlotte's
smoke-screen", and argues that Emily evidently shocked her, to the point
where she may even have doubted her sister's sanity. After Emily's death,
Charlotte rewrote her character, history and even poems on a more acceptable
(to her and the bourgeois reading public) model. Biographer Claire O'Callaghan
suggests that the trajectory of Brontë's legacy was altered significantly by
Elizabeth Gaskell's biography of Charlotte, concerning not only because Gaskell
did not visit Haworth until after Emily's death, but also because Gaskell
admits to disliking what she did know of Emily in her biography of Charlotte.
As O'Callaghan and others have noted, Charlotte was Gaskell's primary source of
information on Emily's life and may have exaggerated or fabricated Emily's
frailty and shyness to cast herself in the role of maternal saviour.
Charlotte
presented Emily as someone whose "natural" love of the beauties of
nature had become somewhat exaggerated owing to her shy nature, portraying her
as too fond of the Yorkshire moors, and homesick whenever she was away.
According to Lucasta Miller, in her analysis of Brontë biographies,
"Charlotte took on the role of Emily's first mythographer." In the
Preface to the Second Edition of Wuthering Heights, in 1850, Charlotte wrote:
My
sister's disposition was not naturally gregarious; circumstances favoured and
fostered her tendency to seclusion; except to go to church or take a walk on
the hills, she rarely crossed the threshold of home. Though her feeling for the
people round was benevolent, intercourse with them she never sought; nor, with
very few exceptions, ever experienced. And yet she knew them: knew their ways,
their language their family histories; she could hear of them with interest,
and talk of them with detail, minute, graphic, and accurate; but WITH them, she
rarely exchanged a word.
Emily's
unsociability and extremely shy nature have subsequently been reported many
times. According to Norma Crandall, her "warm, human aspect" was
"usually revealed only in her love of nature and of animals". In a
similar description, Literary news (1883) states: "[Emily] loved the
solemn moors, she loved all wild, free creatures and things", and critics
attest that her love of the moors is manifest in Wuthering Heights. Over the
years, Emily's love of nature has been the subject of many anecdotes. A
newspaper dated 31 December 1899, gives the folksy account that "with bird
and beast [Emily] had the most intimate relations, and from her walks she often
came with fledgling or young rabbit in hand, talking softly to it, quite sure,
too, that it understood". Elizabeth Gaskell, in her biography of
Charlotte, told the story of Emily's punishing her pet dog Keeper for lying
"on the delicate white counterpane" that covered one of the beds in
the Parsonage. According to Gaskell, she struck him with her fists until he was
"half-blind" with his eyes "swelled up". This story is
apocryphal, and contradicts the following account of Emily's and Keeper's
relationship:
Poor
old Keeper, Emily's faithful friend and worshipper, seemed to understand her
like a human being. One evening, when the four friends were sitting closely
round the fire in the sitting-room, Keeper forced himself in between Charlotte
and Emily and mounted himself on Emily's lap; finding the space too limited for
his comfort he pressed himself forward on to the guest's knees, making himself
quite comfortable. Emily's heart was won by the unresisting endurance of the
visitor, little guessing that she herself, being in close contact, was the
inspiring cause of submission to Keeper's preference. Sometimes Emily would
delight in showing off Keeper—make him frantic in action, and roar with the
voice of a lion. It was a terrifying exhibition within the walls of an ordinary
sitting-room. Keeper was a solemn mourner at Emily's funeral and never
recovered his cheerfulness.
In
Queens of Literature of the Victorian Era (1886), Eva Hope summarises Emily's
character as "a peculiar mixture of timidity and Spartan-like
courage", and goes on to say, "She was painfully shy, but physically
she was brave to a surprising degree. She loved few persons, but those few with
a passion of self-sacrificing tenderness and devotion. To other people's
failings she was understanding and forgiving, but over herself she kept a
continual and most austere watch, never allowing herself to deviate for one
instant from what she considered her duty."
No comments:
Post a Comment