218- ] English Literature
D, H, Lawrence
Literary
criticism
Lawrence's
criticism of other authors often provides insight into his own thinking and
writing. Of particular note is his Study of Thomas Hardy and Other Essays.In
Studies in Classic American Literature Lawrence's responses to writers like
Walt Whitman, Herman Melville and Edgar Allan Poe also shed light on his craft.
Plays
Lawrence
wrote A Collier's Friday Night about 1906–1909, though it was not published
until 1939 and not performed until 1965. He wrote The Daughter-in-Law in 1913,
though it was not staged until 1967, when it was well received. In 1911 he
wrote The Widowing of Mrs. Holroyd, which he revised in 1914; it was staged in
the US in 1916 and in the UK in 1920, in an amateur production. It was filmed
in 1976; an adaptation was shown on television (BBC 2) in 1995. He also wrote
Touch and Go towards the end of World War I, and his last play, David, in 1925.
Painting
D. H.
Lawrence had a lifelong interest in painting, which became one of his main
forms of expression in his last years. His paintings were exhibited at the
Warren Gallery in London's Mayfair in 1929. The exhibition was extremely
controversial, with many of the 13,000 people visiting mainly to gawk. The
Daily Express claimed, "Fight with an Amazon represents a hideous, bearded
man holding a fair-haired woman in his lascivious grip while wolves with
dripping jaws look on expectantly, [this] is frankly indecent".[45]
However, several artists and art experts praised the paintings. Gwen John,
reviewing the exhibition in Everyman, spoke of Lawrence's "stupendous gift
of self-expression" and singled out The Finding of Moses, Red Willow Trees
and Boccaccio Story as "pictures of real beauty and great vitality".
Others singled out Contadini for special praise. After a complaint, the police
seized thirteen of the twenty-five paintings, including Boccaccio Story and
Contadini. Despite declarations of support from many writers, artists, and
members of Parliament, Lawrence was able to recover his paintings only by
agreeing never to exhibit them in England again. Years after his death, his widow
Frieda asked artist and friend Joseph Glasco to arrange an exhibition of
Lawrence's paintings, which he discussed with his gallerist Catherine Viviano.
The largest collection of the paintings is now at La Fonda de Taos hotel in
Taos, New Mexico. Several others, including Boccaccio Story and Resurrection,
are at the Humanities Research Centre of the University of Texas at Austin.
Lady
Chatterley trial
A
heavily censored abridgement of Lady Chatterley's Lover was published in the
United States by Alfred A. Knopf in 1928. This edition was posthumously
reissued in paperback in the United States by both Signet Books and Penguin
Books in 1946. The first unexpurgated edition of Lady Chatterley's Lover was
printed in July 1928 in Florence by a small publisher, Giuseppe Orioli: 1000
copies in a very good print, according D. H. Lawrence, who wrote a thank-you
poem to Orioli. When the unexpurgated edition of Lady Chatterley's Lover was
published by Penguin Books in Britain in 1960, the trial of Penguin under the
Obscene Publications Act of 1959 became a major public event and a test of the
new obscenity law. The 1959 act (introduced by Roy Jenkins) had made it
possible for publishers to escape conviction if they could show that a work was
of literary merit. One of the objections was to the frequent use of the word
"fuck" and its derivatives and the word "cunt".
Various
academic critics and experts of diverse kinds, including E. M. Forster, Helen
Gardner, Richard Hoggart, Raymond Williams and Norman St John-Stevas, were
called as witnesses, and the verdict, delivered on 2 November 1960, was
"not guilty". This resulted in a far greater degree of freedom for
publishing explicit material in the UK. The prosecution was ridiculed for being
out of touch with changing social norms when the chief prosecutor, Mervyn
Griffith-Jones, asked if it were the kind of book "you would wish your
wife or servants to read".
The
Penguin second edition, published in 1961, contains a publisher's dedication,
which reads: "For having published this book, Penguin Books were
prosecuted under the Obscene Publications Act, 1959 at the Old Bailey in London
from 20 October to 2 November 1960. This edition is therefore dedicated to the
twelve jurors, three women and nine men, who returned a verdict of 'Not Guilty'
and thus made D. H. Lawrence's last novel available for the first time to the
public in the United Kingdom."
Philosophy
and politics
Despite
often writing about political, spiritual and philosophical matters, Lawrence
was essentially contrary by nature and hated to be pigeonholed. Critics such as
Terry Eagleton have argued that Lawrence was right-wing due to his lukewarm
attitude to democracy, which he intimated would tend towards the leveling down
of society and the subordination of the individual to the sensibilities of the
"average" man. In his letters to Bertrand Russell around 1915,
Lawrence voiced his opposition to enfranchising the working class and his
hostility to the burgeoning labour movements, and disparaged the French
Revolution, referring to "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity" as the
"three-fanged serpent." Rather than a republic, Lawrence called for
an absolute dictator and equivalent dictatrix to lord over the lower peoples.[51]
In 1953, recalling his relationship with Lawrence in the First World War,
Russell characterised Lawrence as a "proto-German Fascist," saying
"I was a firm believer in democracy, whereas he had developed the whole
philosophy of Fascism before the politicians had thought of it." Russell
felt Lawrence to be a positive force for evil. However, in 1924 Lawrence wrote
an epilogue to Movements in European History (a textbook he wrote, originally
published in 1921) in which he denounced fascism and Soviet-style socialism as
bullying and "a mere worship of Force". Further, he declared "I
believe a good form of socialism, if it could be brought about, would be the
best form of government." In the late 1920s, he told his sister he would
vote Labour if he was living back in England. In general, though, Lawrence
disliked any organized groupings, and in his essay Democracy, written in the
late twenties, he argued for a new kind of democracy in which
each
man shall be spontaneously himself – each man himself, each woman herself,
without any question of equality or inequality entering in at all; and that no
man shall try to determine the being of any other man, or of any other woman.
Lawrence
held seemingly contradictory views on feminism. The evidence of his written
works, particularly his earlier novels, indicates a commitment to representing
women as strong, independent, and complex; he produced major works in which
young, self-directing female characters were central. In his youth he supported
extending the vote to women, and he once wrote, "All women in their
natures are like giantesses. They will break through everything and go on with
their own lives." However, some feminist critics, notably Kate Millett,
have criticised, indeed ridiculed, Lawrence's sexual politics, Millett claiming
that he uses his female characters as mouthpieces to promote his creed of male
supremacy and that his story The Woman Who Rode Away showed Lawrence as a
pornographic sadist with its portrayal of "human sacrifice performed upon
the woman to the greater glory and potency of the male." Brenda Maddox
further highlights this story and two others written around the same time, St.
Mawr and The Princess, as "masterworks of misogyny."
Despite
the inconsistency and at times inscrutability of his philosophical writings,
Lawrence continues to find an audience, and the publication of a new scholarly
edition of his letters and writings has demonstrated the range of his
achievement. Philosophers like Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari found in
Lawrence's critique of Sigmund Freud an important precursor of anti-Oedipal
accounts of the unconscious that has been much influential.
No comments:
Post a Comment