235- ] English Literature
George Bernard Shaw
Beliefs and opinions
Throughout
his lifetime Shaw professed many beliefs, often contradictory. This
inconsistency was partly an intentional provocation—the Spanish
scholar-statesman Salvador de Madariaga describes Shaw as "a pole of
negative electricity set in a people of positive electricity". In one area
at least Shaw was constant: in his lifelong refusal to follow normal English forms
of spelling and punctuation. He favoured archaic spellings such as
"shew" for "show"; he dropped the "u" in words
like "honour" and "favour"; and wherever possible he
rejected the apostrophe in contractions such as "won't" or
"that's". In his will, Shaw ordered that, after some specified
legacies, his remaining assets were to form a trust to pay for fundamental
reform of the English alphabet into a phonetic version of forty letters. Though
Shaw's intentions were clear, his drafting was flawed, and the courts initially
ruled the intended trust void. A later out-of-court agreement provided a sum of
£8,300 for spelling reform; the bulk of his fortune went to the residuary
legatees—the British Museum, the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art and the National
Gallery of Ireland. Most of the £8,300 went on a special phonetic edition of
Androcles and the Lion in the Shavian alphabet, published in 1962 to a largely
indifferent reception.
Shaw's
views on religion and Christianity were less consistent. Having in his youth
proclaimed himself an atheist, in middle age he explained this as a reaction
against the Old Testament image of a vengeful Jehovah. By the early twentieth
century, he termed himself a "mystic", although Gary Sloan, in an
essay on Shaw's beliefs, disputes his credentials as such. In 1913 Shaw
declared that he was not religious "in the sectarian sense", aligning
himself with Jesus as "a person of no religion". In the preface
(1915) to Androcles and the Lion, Shaw asks "Why not give Christianity a
chance?" contending that Britain's social order resulted from the
continuing choice of Barabbas over Christ. In a broadcast just before the
Second World War, Shaw invoked the Sermon on the Mount, "a very moving
exhortation, and it gives you one first-rate tip, which is to do good to those
who despitefully use you and persecute you". In his will, Shaw stated that
his "religious convictions and scientific views cannot at present be more
specifically defined than as those of a believer in creative revolution".
He requested that no one should imply that he accepted the beliefs of any
specific religious organisation, and that no memorial to him should "take
the form of a cross or any other instrument of torture or symbol of blood
sacrifice".
Shaw
espoused racial equality, and inter-marriage between people of different races.
Despite his expressed wish to be fair to Hitler, he called anti-Semitism
"the hatred of the lazy, ignorant fat-headed Gentile for the pertinacious
Jew who, schooled by adversity to use his brains to the utmost, outdoes him in
business".[304] In The Jewish Chronicle he wrote in 1932, "In every
country you can find rabid people who have a phobia against Jews, Jesuits,
Armenians, Negroes, Freemasons, Irishmen, or simply foreigners as such.
Political parties are not above exploiting these fears and jealousies."
In
1903 Shaw joined in a controversy about vaccination against smallpox. He called
vaccination "a peculiarly filthy piece of witchcraft"; in his view
immunisation campaigns were a cheap and inadequate substitute for a decent
programme of housing for the poor, which would, he declared, be the means of
eradicating smallpox and other infectious diseases. Less contentiously, Shaw
was keenly interested in transport; Laurence observed in 1992 a need for a
published study of Shaw's interest in "bicycling, motorbikes, automobiles,
and planes, climaxing in his joining the Interplanetary Society in his
nineties". Shaw published articles on travel, took photographs of his
journeys, and submitted notes to the Royal Automobile Club.
Shaw
strove throughout his adult life to be referred to as "Bernard Shaw"
rather than "George Bernard Shaw", but confused matters by continuing
to use his full initials—G.B.S.—as a by-line, and often signed himself "G.
Bernard Shaw". He left instructions in his will that his executor (the
Public Trustee) was to license publication of his works only under the name
Bernard Shaw. Shaw scholars including Ervine, Judith Evans, Holroyd, Laurence
and Weintraub, and many publishers have respected Shaw's preference, although
the Cambridge University Press was among the exceptions with its 1988 Cambridge
Companion to George Bernard Shaw.
Legacy and influence
Theatrical
Shaw
did not found a school of dramatists as such, but Crawford asserts that today
"we recognise [him] as second only to Shakespeare in the British
theatrical tradition ... the proponent of the theater of ideas" who struck
a death-blow to 19th-century melodrama. According to Laurence, Shaw pioneered
"intelligent" theatre, in which the audience was required to think,
thereby paving the way for the new breeds of twentieth-century playwrights from
Galsworthy to Pinter.
Crawford
lists numerous playwrights whose work owes something to that of Shaw. Among
those active in Shaw's lifetime he includes Noël Coward, who based his early
comedy The Young Idea on You Never Can Tell and continued to draw on the older
man's works in later plays. T. S. Eliot, by no means an admirer of Shaw,
admitted that the epilogue of Murder in the Cathedral, in which Becket's slayers
explain their actions to the audience, might have been influenced by Saint
Joan. The critic Eric Bentley comments that Eliot's later play The Confidential
Clerk "had all the earmarks of Shavianism ... without the merits of the
real Bernard Shaw". Among more recent British dramatists, Crawford marks
Tom Stoppard as "the most Shavian of contemporary playwrights";
Shaw's "serious farce" is continued in the works of Stoppard's
contemporaries Alan Ayckbourn, Henry Livings and Peter Nichols.
Shaw's
influence crossed the Atlantic at an early stage. Bernard Dukore notes that he
was successful as a dramatist in America ten years before achieving comparable
success in Britain. Among many American writers professing a direct debt to
Shaw, Eugene O'Neill became an admirer at the age of seventeen, after reading
The Quintessence of Ibsenism. Other Shaw-influenced American playwrights
mentioned by Dukore are Elmer Rice, for whom Shaw "opened doors, turned on
lights, and expanded horizons"; William Saroyan, who empathised with Shaw
as "the embattled individualist against the philistines"; and S. N.
Behrman, who was inspired to write for the theatre after attending a
performance of Caesar and Cleopatra: "I thought it would be agreeable to
write plays like that".
Assessing
Shaw's reputation in a 1976 critical study, T. F. Evans described Shaw as
unchallenged in his lifetime and since as the leading English-language
dramatist of the (twentieth) century, and as a master of prose style. The
following year, in a contrary assessment, the playwright John Osborne
castigated The Guardian's theatre critic Michael Billington for referring to
Shaw as "the greatest British dramatist since Shakespeare". Osborne
responded that Shaw "is the most fraudulent, inept writer of Victorian
melodramas ever to gull a timid critic or fool a dull public". Despite
this hostility, Crawford sees the influence of Shaw in some of Osborne's plays,
and concludes that though the latter's work is neither imitative nor
derivative, these affinities are sufficient to classify Osborne as an inheritor
of Shaw.
In
a 1983 study, R. J. Kaufmann suggests that Shaw was a key
forerunner—"godfather, if not actually finicky paterfamilias"—of the
Theatre of the Absurd. Two further aspects of Shaw's theatrical legacy are
noted by Crawford: his opposition to stage censorship, which was finally ended
in 1968, and his efforts which extended over many years to establish a National
Theatre. Shaw's short 1910 play The Dark Lady of the Sonnets, in which
Shakespeare pleads with Queen Elizabeth I for the endowment of a state theatre,
was part of this campaign.
Writing
in The New Statesman in 2012 Daniel Janes commented that Shaw's reputation had
declined by the time of his 150th anniversary in 2006 but had recovered
considerably. In Janes's view, the many current revivals of Shaw's major works
showed the playwright's "almost unlimited relevance to our times". In
the same year, Mark Lawson wrote in The Guardian that Shaw's moral concerns
engaged present-day audiences, and made him—like his model, Ibsen—one of the
most popular playwrights in contemporary British theatre.
The
Shaw Festival in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada is the second largest
repertory theatre company in North America. It produces plays by or written
during the lifetime of Shaw as well as some contemporary works. The Gingold
Theatrical Group, founded in 2006, presents works by Shaw and others in New
York City that feature the humanitarian ideals that his work promoted. It
became the first theatre group to present all of Shaw's stage work through its
monthly concert series Project Shaw.
General
In
the 1940s the author Harold Nicolson advised the National Trust not to accept
the bequest of Shaw's Corner, predicting that Shaw would be totally forgotten
within fifty years. In the event, Shaw's broad cultural legacy, embodied in the
widely used term "Shavian", has endured and is nurtured by Shaw
Societies in various parts of the world. The original society was founded in
London in 1941 and survives; it organises meetings and events, and publishes a
regular bulletin The Shavian. The Shaw Society of America began in June 1950;
it foundered in the 1970s but its journal, adopted by Penn State University
Press, continued to be published as Shaw: The Annual of Bernard Shaw Studies until
2004. A second American organisation, founded in 1951 as "The Bernard Shaw
Society", remains active as of 2016. More recent societies have been
established in Japan and India.
Besides
his collected music criticism, Shaw has left a varied musical legacy, not all
of it of his choosing. Despite his dislike of having his work adapted for the
musical theatre ("my plays set themselves to a verbal music of their
own") two of his plays were turned into musical comedies: Arms and the Man
was the basis of The Chocolate Soldier in 1908, with music by Oscar Straus, and
Pygmalion was adapted in 1956 as My Fair Lady with book and lyrics by Alan Jay
Lerner and music by Frederick Loewe. Although he had a high regard for Elgar,
Shaw turned down the composer's request for an opera libretto, but played a
major part in persuading the BBC to commission Elgar's Third Symphony, and was
the dedicatee of The Severn Suite (1930).
The
substance of Shaw's political legacy is uncertain. In 1921 Shaw's erstwhile
collaborator William Archer, in a letter to the playwright, wrote: "I
doubt if there is any case of a man so widely read, heard, seen, and known as
yourself, who has produced so little effect on his generation." Margaret
Cole, who considered Shaw the greatest writer of his age, professed never to
have understood him. She thought he worked "immensely hard" at
politics, but essentially, she surmises, it was for fun—"the fun of a
brilliant artist". After Shaw's death, Pearson wrote: "No one since
the time of Tom Paine has had so definite an influence on the social and
political life of his time and country as Bernard Shaw."
In
its obituary tribute to Shaw, The Times Literary Supplement concluded:
He
was no originator of ideas. He was an insatiable adopter and adapter, an
incomparable prestidigitator with the thoughts of the forerunners. Nietzsche,
Samuel Butler (Erewhon), Marx, Shelley, Blake, Dickens, William Morris, Ruskin,
Beethoven and Wagner all had their applications and misapplications. By bending
to their service all the faculties of a powerful mind, by inextinguishable wit,
and by every artifice of argument, he carried their thoughts as far as they
would reach—so far beyond their sources that they came to us with the vitality
of the newly created.